公司資料

了解 Rockfort Markets

公司資料

了解 Rockfort Markets

Rockfort Markets Limited is a financial services company located in Auckland, New Zealand. The company provides online trading services to retail and institutional clients, offering access to a wide range of global markets including Forex, share CFDs, indices, and commodities. They are a licensed Derivative Issuer regulated by the New Zealand Financial Markets Authority (FMA). Rockfort Markets emphasizes providing a secure and technologically advanced trading environment, offering popular platforms like MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and Trader Workstation.

行業

外匯零售經紀主要
財務其他服務
科技軟件交易平台

軟件

無可用數據

呢個部分好似係空嘅。快啲返嚟睇更新！

聯絡

社交

此服務在您所在的地區不可用。

未經證實

Rockfort Markets

不適用

成立於

2017 (9 年)

成立

最後上線: 最近無活動

索償公司訪問網站

暫無 TrustScore分數不足，無法顯示趨勢。

成為首個為該公司評分與評論的使用者。

綜合得分

牌照

--/40

評論

--/60

0 則評價

由 TrustFinance 提供

暫無 TrustScore分數不足，無法顯示趨勢。

成為首個為該公司評分與評論的使用者。

TrustFinance 不是持牌金融顧問，也與您所在地區的任何金融機構無關聯。我們鼓勵您在做出任何投資決定前自行研究。

FTD LIMITED

(505 評論)

British Virgin Islands

2017

(9 年)

安全資訊 :

BVI FSC

安全資訊

警告

該公司目前未經證實.

請注意潛在風險！

牌照

甲級牌照

由全球知名監管機構頒發，這些許可證透過嚴格的合規性、資金隔離、保險和定期審計，確保最高程度的交易者保護。爭議解決和遵守 AML/CTF 標準進一步提高了安全性。

B 級牌照

由受尊敬的區域監管機構授予，這些許可證提供強大的安全措施，例如資金隔離、財務報告和補償計劃。雖然沒有等級 1 那麼嚴格，但它們提供可靠的區域保護。

C 級牌照

由新興市場的監管機構頒發，這些許可證提供基本保護，例如最低資本要求和 AML 政策。監管較不嚴格，因此交易者應謹慎行事並驗證安全措施。

D 級牌照

來自監管最少的司法管轄區，這些許可證通常缺乏關鍵保護，例如資金隔離和保險。雖然它們對營運彈性很有吸引力，但它們對交易者構成較高的風險。

TrustFinance 不是持牌金融顧問，也與您所在地區的任何金融機構無關聯。我們鼓勵您在做出任何投資決定前自行研究。

警告報告

警告報告是關於交易活動、賬戶管理或合規問題的警示記錄。它幫助你跟蹤交易賬戶中的潛在風險或問題。

關閉

Nov 09, 2566

呢個經紀已經關閉。

關閉

Mar 12, 2024

呢間經紀公司已經結業。

公司資料

了解 Rockfort Markets

公司資料

了解 Rockfort Markets

行業

外匯零售經紀主要
財務其他服務
科技軟件交易平台

軟件

無可用數據

呢個部分好似係空嘅。快啲返嚟睇更新！

聯絡

社交

睇Rockfort Markets嘅用戶仲睇…

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

新聞

TrustFinance 情報機構

研究日期: Okt 14, 2025

The article discusses the High Court case of Rockfort Markets Limited v Financial Markets Authority, focusing on the cancellation of Rockfort's derivatives issuer license due to multiple compliance failures. The FMA identified material contraventions related to governance, client suitability assessments, misleading advertising, and inadequate disclosure. The court upheld the FMA's decision to cancel the license, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of failing to address identified issues. The case serves as a cautionary tale for market service licensees about the necessity of maintaining robust compliance frameworks and following through on commitments made to regulators.

The article discusses the High Court case of Rockfort Markets Limited v Financial Markets Authority, focusing on the cancellation of Rockfort's derivatives issuer license due to multiple compliance failures. The FMA identified material contraventions related to governance, client suitability assessments, misleading advertising, and inadequate disclosure. The court upheld the FMA's decision to cancel the license, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of failing to address identified issues. The case serves as a cautionary tale for market service licensees about the necessity of maintaining robust compliance frameworks and following through on commitments made to regulators.

The High Court delivered a ruling in the case of Rockfort Markets Limited v FMA, clarifying the standards for appealing decisions made by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) regarding market services licenses. The court upheld the FMA's cancellation of Rockfort's license due to multiple breaches of obligations under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. Key points include that the appeal process allows the court to substitute its own judgment for that of the FMA, but licensees may find it challenging to prove the FMA erred. The case emphasizes the importance of compliance and investment in robust policies and procedures by licensees.

The High Court delivered a ruling in the case of Rockfort Markets Limited v FMA, clarifying the standards for appealing decisions made by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) regarding market services licenses. The court upheld the FMA's cancellation of Rockfort's license due to multiple breaches of obligations under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. Key points include that the appeal process allows the court to substitute its own judgment for that of the FMA, but licensees may find it challenging to prove the FMA erred. The case emphasizes the importance of compliance and investment in robust policies and procedures by licensees.

由TrustFinance AI分析提供

The article discusses the High Court case of Rockfort Markets Limited v Financial Markets Authority, focusing on the cancellation of Rockfort's derivatives issuer license due to multiple compliance failures. The FMA identified material contraventions related to governance, client suitability assessments, misleading advertising, and inadequate disclosure. The court upheld the FMA's decision to cancel the license, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of failing to address identified issues. The case serves as a cautionary tale for market service licensees about the necessity of maintaining robust compliance frameworks and following through on commitments made to regulators.

The High Court delivered a ruling in the case of Rockfort Markets Limited v FMA, clarifying the standards for appealing decisions made by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) regarding market services licenses. The court upheld the FMA's cancellation of Rockfort's license due to multiple breaches of obligations under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. Key points include that the appeal process allows the court to substitute its own judgment for that of the FMA, but licensees may find it challenging to prove the FMA erred. The case emphasizes the importance of compliance and investment in robust policies and procedures by licensees.

由TrustFinance AI分析提供