Informasi Perusahaan

Mengenal Rockfort Markets

Tampilkan Lebih Banyak

Informasi Perusahaan

Mengenal Rockfort Markets

Rockfort Markets Limited is a financial services company located in Auckland, New Zealand. The company provides online trading services to retail and institutional clients, offering access to a wide range of global markets including Forex, share CFDs, indices, and commodities. They are a licensed Derivative Issuer regulated by the New Zealand Financial Markets Authority (FMA). Rockfort Markets emphasizes providing a secure and technologically advanced trading environment, offering popular platforms like MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and Trader Workstation.

Tampilkan Lebih Banyak

Industri

Valuta Asing Pialang RitelUTAMA
Keuangan Layanan Lainnya
Teknologi Platform Perdagangan Perangkat Lunak

Perangkat Lunak

Tidak ada data yang tersedia

Sepertinya bagian ini kosong. Segera kembali untuk pembaruan!

Kontak

Sosial

LAYANAN INI TIDAK TERSEDIA DI WILAYAH ANDA

Belum Terbukti

Rockfort Markets

Tidak Berlaku

Didirikan

2017 (9 Tahun)

Ditemukan

Terakhir online: Tidak ada aktivitas terbaru

Klaim perusahaan Kunjungi Situs Web

TrustScore tidak tersediaSkor belum cukup untuk menampilkan tren.

Jadilah yang pertama memberi rating dan ulasan untuk perusahaan ini.

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Lisensi

--/40

Ulasan

--/60

0 ulasan

Disediakan oleh TrustFinance

TrustScore tidak tersediaSkor belum cukup untuk menampilkan tren.

Jadilah yang pertama memberi rating dan ulasan untuk perusahaan ini.

TrustFinance bukan penasihat keuangan berlisensi dan tidak berafiliasi dengan lembaga keuangan mana pun di wilayah Anda. Kami menyarankan Anda melakukan riset sendiri sebelum membuat keputusan investasi.

Diatur

Direkomendasikan

(73 ulasan)

Cyprus

2009

(17 tahun)

Informasi Keamanan :

CySEC

FSCA

DFSA

Informasi Keamanan

Peringatan

Perusahaan ini saat ini Belum Terbukti.

Harap berhati-hati terhadap potensi risiko!

Lisensi

Lisensi Kelas A

Dikeluarkan oleh regulator terkenal secara global, lisensi ini memastikan perlindungan pedagang tertinggi melalui kepatuhan yang ketat, pemisahan dana, asuransi, dan audit rutin. Penyelesaian sengketa dan kepatuhan terhadap standar AML/CTF semakin meningkatkan keamanan.

Lisensi Kelas B

Diberikan oleh regulator regional yang dihormati, lisensi ini menawarkan langkah-langkah keamanan yang kuat seperti pemisahan dana, pelaporan keuangan, dan skema kompensasi. Meskipun sedikit kurang ketat daripada Tingkat 1, lisensi ini memberikan perlindungan regional yang dapat diandalkan.

Lisensi Kelas C

Dikeluarkan oleh regulator di pasar negara berkembang, lisensi ini menawarkan perlindungan dasar seperti persyaratan modal minimum dan kebijakan AML. Pengawasan kurang ketat, sehingga pedagang harus berhati-hati dan memverifikasi langkah-langkah keamanan.

Lisensi Kelas D

Dari yurisdiksi dengan pengawasan minimal, lisensi ini seringkali tidak memiliki perlindungan utama seperti pemisahan dana dan asuransi. Meskipun menarik untuk fleksibilitas operasional, lisensi ini menimbulkan risiko yang lebih tinggi bagi pedagang.

Laporan Peringatan

Laporan Peringatan adalah catatan peringatan tentang aktivitas perdagangan, manajemen akun, atau masalah kepatuhan. Ini membantu Anda melacak potensi risiko atau masalah dalam akun perdagangan Anda.

Tutup

Nov 09, 2566

Broker ini tutup.

Tutup

Mar 12, 2024

Broker ini tutup.

Informasi Perusahaan

Mengenal Rockfort Markets

Tampilkan Lebih Banyak

Informasi Perusahaan

Mengenal Rockfort Markets

Tampilkan Lebih Banyak

Industri

Valuta Asing Pialang RitelUTAMA
Keuangan Layanan Lainnya
Teknologi Platform Perdagangan Perangkat Lunak

Perangkat Lunak

Tidak ada data yang tersedia

Sepertinya bagian ini kosong. Segera kembali untuk pembaruan!

Kontak

Sosial

Pengguna yang melihat Rockfort Markets juga melihat…

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

Berita

TrustFinance Badan Intelijen

Tanggal penelitian: Okt 14, 2025

The article discusses the High Court case of Rockfort Markets Limited v Financial Markets Authority, focusing on the cancellation of Rockfort's derivatives issuer license due to multiple compliance failures. The FMA identified material contraventions related to governance, client suitability assessments, misleading advertising, and inadequate disclosure. The court upheld the FMA's decision to cancel the license, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of failing to address identified issues. The case serves as a cautionary tale for market service licensees about the necessity of maintaining robust compliance frameworks and following through on commitments made to regulators.

The article discusses the High Court case of Rockfort Markets Limited v Financial Markets Authority, focusing on the cancellation of Rockfort's derivatives issuer license due to multiple compliance failures. The FMA identified material contraventions related to governance, client suitability assessments, misleading advertising, and inadequate disclosure. The court upheld the FMA's decision to cancel the license, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of failing to address identified issues. The case serves as a cautionary tale for market service licensees about the necessity of maintaining robust compliance frameworks and following through on commitments made to regulators.

The High Court delivered a ruling in the case of Rockfort Markets Limited v FMA, clarifying the standards for appealing decisions made by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) regarding market services licenses. The court upheld the FMA's cancellation of Rockfort's license due to multiple breaches of obligations under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. Key points include that the appeal process allows the court to substitute its own judgment for that of the FMA, but licensees may find it challenging to prove the FMA erred. The case emphasizes the importance of compliance and investment in robust policies and procedures by licensees.

The High Court delivered a ruling in the case of Rockfort Markets Limited v FMA, clarifying the standards for appealing decisions made by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) regarding market services licenses. The court upheld the FMA's cancellation of Rockfort's license due to multiple breaches of obligations under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. Key points include that the appeal process allows the court to substitute its own judgment for that of the FMA, but licensees may find it challenging to prove the FMA erred. The case emphasizes the importance of compliance and investment in robust policies and procedures by licensees.

Disediakan oleh Analisis AI TrustFinance

Ulasan

Rockfort Markets Ulasan

Ulasan

Total 0

Analisis Tinjauan AI

Mari biarkan TrustFinance AI merangkum semua ulasan untuk Anda.

Disediakan oleh Analisis AI TrustFinance

Urutkan berdasarkan

Filter

Berita

TrustFinance Badan Intelijen

Tanggal penelitian: Okt 14, 2025

The article discusses the High Court case of Rockfort Markets Limited v Financial Markets Authority, focusing on the cancellation of Rockfort's derivatives issuer license due to multiple compliance failures. The FMA identified material contraventions related to governance, client suitability assessments, misleading advertising, and inadequate disclosure. The court upheld the FMA's decision to cancel the license, emphasizing the importance of regulatory compliance and the consequences of failing to address identified issues. The case serves as a cautionary tale for market service licensees about the necessity of maintaining robust compliance frameworks and following through on commitments made to regulators.

The High Court delivered a ruling in the case of Rockfort Markets Limited v FMA, clarifying the standards for appealing decisions made by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) regarding market services licenses. The court upheld the FMA's cancellation of Rockfort's license due to multiple breaches of obligations under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. Key points include that the appeal process allows the court to substitute its own judgment for that of the FMA, but licensees may find it challenging to prove the FMA erred. The case emphasizes the importance of compliance and investment in robust policies and procedures by licensees.

Disediakan oleh Analisis AI TrustFinance